Dr. Joel Bloch, the video maker of “Plagiarism?
Are you kidding?’, discusses the functions of citing sources in summary. The
male student in this video insists that citing is unnecessary and time-wasting because
the professor only wants to know he has read everything. The female student opposes
his idea because citing is the indispensable rule of summary. In addition, she explains
that if more people have similar opinions, his argument can seem more believable.
In contrast, he argues that paraphrasing every sentence differently is so difficult
for him to approach. However, she states that writing main ideas is better and more
trustworthy. Furthermore, she admits that sometimes citing is redundant, but we
should cite for readers who wants to track more information in addition to show
these ideas are others’intellectual properties.
Whether only writing down main idea of the
passage can show our well reading of it instead of paraphrasing each sentence
into a different form to constitute our summary or not is a hot topic in this
video. In my opinion, the female student is more reasonable. The definition of
summary is generalizing the main idea of the passage to show our thorough
reading and understanding of the article. So main idea is enough and even
better than paraphrase of each sentence for summary.
However, you still have to paraphrase even the main idea.
ReplyDelete