In recent time, plagiarism and copyright infringement
are the very popular topics to discuss in public. There is a hot topic which is
the differences between the plagiarism and the copyright infringement. Specifically
speaking, plagiarism and copyright infringement can be different in legitimization
which is I think is a main difference. In other words, plagiarism does not
apply to the law. In “the plagiarism is not a big moral deal”, the author Stanley
Fish claim that the plagiarism is a rule of the academic rules that everyone
who participate in academia should follow rather than a moral issue which refer
to plagiarism can be judged by the people’s stereotype. Namely, plagiarism is
not applicable to the law. Moreover, in the Salon.com, the author Charles
Cronin points out that there is a copyright law to protect the people’s intellectual
property from being offended by other people which refer to the copyright
infringement by using the music copyright infringement as a example. In contrast,
other groups of people argue that the main difference between copyright infringement
and plagiarism is the definition of these two behaviors. In Salon.com, The
professor Jonathan Zittrain insist that plagiarism is a lie about copying from
other people’s work, yet the copyright is the behavior that a people copy other’s
work. In conclusion, there could numerous of differences that plagiarism and
the copyright infringement have, so this topic can be continually discussed in
the future.
Also cite another article besides salon.com
ReplyDelete